Select the search type
  • Site
  • Web
Search

Search Results

Why Your AI Agent Fails 97.5% of Real Work — And the Fix Isn't More Code

Published on AgileAIDev.com | By Rod Claar, CST & Principal Consultant

Rod Claar 0 8888 Article rating: No rating

Most AI agent projects fail not because of bad code or weak models — they fail because teams aim at the wrong part of the workflow. AI strategist Nate B. Jones argues that real work is only about 2.5% high-judgment "core" decisions, while the other 97.5% is mechanical edge work: data prep, QA, synthesis, handoffs, and packaging. Teams that try to automate the core first stall out fast. Teams that start with the edges — the boring stuff surrounding the valuable work — ship results in days, build organizational trust, and create a proven path toward eventually tackling the core. It's the same principle behind Agile: start small, deliver value fast, and expand from a foundation of demonstrated success. The fix isn't better AI. It's smarter strategy about where you start.

RSS

Article Search

Categories

Calendar

«August 2026»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
262728
2930311
23
4
5
6
78
910
11121314
15
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

Upcoming events Events RSSiCalendar export